University of Haifa · Chaikin Institute for Geostrategy

Ami Pedahzur

Professor of Geostrategic Studies

Researching terrorism, political extremism, special operations forces, and the changing character of warfare.

"Understanding political violence requires moving beyond headlines to the networks, ideologies, and strategic calculations that drive it."
Prof. Ami Pedahzur
Professor of Geostrategic Studies, University of Haifa

About

My research asks a central question: how do states and non-state actors use organized violence, and what does that tell us about power, ideology, and strategy? Over three decades I have studied suicide terrorism, religious and ethno-nationalist extremism, and the evolution of special operations forces — work that has taken me from IDF archives to field interviews across three continents.

I direct the Chaikin Institute for Geostrategy at the University of Haifa and hold a professorship in Geostrategic Studies. Before returning to Israel I spent two decades at the University of Texas at Austin, where I built an interdisciplinary research program at the intersection of security studies and computational methods. My books have been published by Oxford University Press, Columbia University Press, Polity Press, and Routledge.

Research Fields

  • Terrorism and Political Violence
  • Political Extremism
  • Special Operations Forces
  • Counterterrorism
  • Social Network Analysis
  • AI-Enhanced Research Methods

Current Work

Recent directions and active research themes

2025

Territorial control and violent non-state actors

Recent work examines how territorial control transforms the capabilities and vulnerabilities of violent organizations.

Ongoing

Special operations forces and political influence

Research on how elite military institutions shape doctrine, national security policy, and political leadership.

Methods

AI, data, and political violence research

Work on research design, social network analysis, and computational methods for studying security and conflict.

AI-Assisted Research Methods for the Social Sciences

Short notes on research repositories and public project sites that document how AI can support, but not replace, social-scientific interpretation.

This research program treats the AI workflow as part of the method. Each repository makes visible the model-assisted step, the prompt logic, the data structure, and the point at which human validation enters the pipeline. The goal is not automation for its own sake, but more transparent and reproducible research on political violence, security studies, and historical processes.

View GitHub Profile
Foundational Working Paper

Managing High-Volume Digital Sources in Political Research with Emerging Technologies

Jonathan Grossman, Orel B. Amano, and Ami Pedahzur circulated this January 2022 SSRN working paper before ChatGPT became publicly accessible. The draft argued that the central methodological challenge was no longer merely finding digital sources, but organizing high-volume, mostly unstructured material without losing context, source criticism, or human interpretation.

The paper became an early bridge to my later work on AI-assisted research methods: it framed personal knowledge management, annotation, linking, and retrieval as part of the research design rather than as private note-taking infrastructure.

Read the SSRN draft →
Conceptual Analysis

Conceptualization: defining special operations forces

Research topic. This repository asks how scholars and doctrine writers have defined "special operations forces" across 69 definitions published between 1944 and 2018. AI-assisted extraction and coding help organize definitions around four dimensions: designation, organization, operators, and role/function.

Contribution. The project turns conceptual analysis into an auditable workflow. It shows that special operations forces behave as a family-resemblance category rather than a concept with one necessary core, and it uses multiple correspondence analysis to reveal variation across time and country.

Open repository →
Historical Method

Historical Entity Tracker: multilingual entity resolution

Research topic. This repository develops a tool for tracing people, organizations, places, and events across multilingual historical corpora. It extracts entities and events from unstructured documents, grounds them in source quotations, and proposes cross-document links for review.

Contribution. The project is built around a conservative methodological principle: co-presence is a hypothesis, not a fact. LLMs generate confidence-scored candidate links, but a historian adjudicates them before they become evidence for process tracing or causal interpretation.

Open repository →
Event Data

October_7: reproducible data on unit deployment

Research topic. This repository hosts workflow, data, and analysis for studying the role of special operations forces during the October 7, 2023 attack. It includes location and unit datasets, descriptive infographics, inferential analysis, and a public project website.

Contribution. The project demonstrates how AI-assisted organization and analysis can support transparent research on contemporary historical events. The emphasis is on reproducibility: the data, analytical pipeline, visualizations, and human-reviewed outputs are connected in one open workflow.

Open repository →
Work in Progress

Settlements: a quantitative panel of territorial change

Research topic. This project assembles a settlement-level panel combining population histories, electoral results, socio-economic measures, built-up area, and geography across the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and the Golan Heights.

Contribution. A curated research workbook and reproducible pipeline connect source crosswalks, an analysis-ready database, and an interactive map. The data model, matching decisions, and analysis remain under active development.

Open repository →

Books

Monographs and edited volumes

Articles and Chapters

Sourced from Google Scholar

Contact